This: gremlin> t = g.V(1).outE().group().by(label).by(inV());null ==>null gremlin> t.next() ==>created=v[3] ==>knows=v[2]
versus the "correct" answer of: gremlin> g.V(1).outE().group().by(label).by(inV().fold()).next() ==>created=[v[3]] ==>knows=[v[2], v[4]] On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Marko Rodriguez <okramma...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I don't understand the question. Can you provide a simple example? > > Thanks, > Marko. > > http://markorodriguez.com > > On Feb 25, 2016, at 11:54 AM, Jonathan Ellithorpe <j...@cs.stanford.edu> > wrote: > > > Yup > > > > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 10:27 AM Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> so your question is: why doesn't the Traversal in the by() iterate > >> everything in it rather than requiring the call to fold()? > >> > >> marko, perhaps you're best suited to answer that.... > >> > >> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Jonathan Ellithorpe < > j...@cs.stanford.edu> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Very helpful, thank you. The bits about how the console automatically > >>> iterates over the return value was very helpful. > >>> > >>> One part that was still a little unclear to me was why only next() is > >>> called on the inV() Traversal for the second by(). > >>> > >>> "[the console] only iterates the result of a line of execution. > >> Therefore, > >>> inner Traversal instances do not get that benefit, and as such, inV() > >> only > >>> has next() called upon it pulling a single vertex from the "knows" > edges" > >>> > >>> That only the returned traversal gets iterated makes sense, but why > that > >>> iteration doesn't, in its course, trigger a complete iteration of inV() > >> is > >>> unclear to me. > >>> > >>> I just started using the gremlin console yesterday so this is all new > to > >> me > >>> :) > >>> > >>> Jonathan > >>> > >>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 12:27 PM Kelvin Lawrence < > >>> kelvin.r.lawre...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Thanks for putting this together. I recall we had some good exchanges > >>> last > >>>> year about the good ole console! > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Kelvin > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Tuesday, February 16, 2016 at 8:13:14 AM UTC-6, Stephen Mallette > >>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> We answer a lot of questions on the user mailing list about the > >> Gremlin > >>>>> Console and there are many themes of usage that seem to come up time > >> and > >>>>> time again. I figured that these themes would make a good addition > >> as a > >>>>> tutorial. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>> > >> > http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.1.1-incubating/tutorials/the-gremlin-console/ > >>>>> > >>>>> I hope you all enjoy this more in-depth look at such an important > tool > >>> of > >>>>> the TinkerPop stack. > >>>>> > >>>>> Stephen > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > >
