I just added a the source download link to the homepage and included a link to the TinkerPop dev docs on how to build. It was there already in a way, but the change i put in there makes it more obvious. I think we can check those two items off the list.
I assume everyone is ok with using secur...@apache.org? any thoughts on where we should include this information? is it something that has to be on the home page? can it just be in our reference documentation? finally we do have at least one non-coding committer. so i guess that once we settle on the security thing, we largely cover the maturity model pretty well. On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 6:40 AM, Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> wrote: > On 03/08/2016 12:37 PM, Stephen Mallette wrote: > > Nice Daniel - thanks for doing that.... > > > > As for CD30 note that we do have: > > > > > http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.1.1-incubating/dev/developer/#_getting_started > > Then get it on the front page somehow - it's not enough that we have the > document, it must also be accessible. > > > > > What's expected of QU30? I'm not sure I get that one... > > If someone finds a vulnerability in TinkerPop, they need a place to send > their concerns. You can elect to have a security ML, or you can default > to the secur...@apache.org list. Either way, visitors to the page should > be able to find this information. > > With regards, > Daniel. > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 6:12 AM, Daniel Gruno <rum...@cord.dk> wrote: > > > >> Hi folks, > >> As part of our considerations about graduating TinkerPop, I have gone > >> through the ASF Maturity Model developed by Bertrand Delacretaz and > >> looked at areas where we need to improve. > >> > >> The preliminary assessment can be found at: > >> https://github.com/Humbedooh/maturity_docs/blob/master/tinkerpop.adoc > >> > >> Please review the issues that are not yet okay and let's come up with > >> ways to solve them :) > >> > >> With regards, > >> Daniel. > >> > > > >
