Hi all, Quick question, is Transaction.readWrite() supposed to be used by implementers to signal that a read/write is *about* to happen, or that a read/write *has* happened. The comments indicate the latter:
/** * An internal function that signals a read or a write has occurred - not meant to be called directly by end users. */ public void readWrite(); But the Neo4j Gremlin implementation is using it in the way of the former (that is, using it to signal that a read/write is *about* to happen). Thanks for any clarification on this, want to make sure I'm implementing transactions in the way that's intended. Jonathan
