[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1014?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Marko A. Rodriguez closed TINKERPOP-1014. ----------------------------------------- Resolution: Won't Fix Fix Version/s: 3.2.0-incubating I made calculating requirements much more efficient. I don't think we should get rid of "traverser species" now its important to have bit-optimized traversers in OLAP. > Get rid of Traverser species and TraverserRequirements > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: TINKERPOP-1014 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1014 > Project: TinkerPop > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: process > Affects Versions: 3.1.0-incubating > Reporter: Marko A. Rodriguez > Assignee: Marko A. Rodriguez > Fix For: 3.2.0-incubating > > > I think I fell victim to premature optimization. We should not have this > hierarchy of {{Traverser}} species. The problem -- its not a hierarchy, its > hard to maintain, and the optimization gained is trivial -- at best 3 64-bit > references. > Moreover, we can then get rid of the notion of {{TraverserRequirement}} and > thus, speed up the {{Traversal}} compilation. [~twilmes] You noted that > gathering {{TraverserRequirements}} was a good chunk of compilation time, > right? > As such, we should just have {{DefaultTraverser}} and it has everything we > need where if paths are not used then {{this.path = null}}. Thus, you only > suffer the 64-bit reference. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)