Thanks for the update. I'm not sure I'm reading you the wrong way, but are you saying that you'd like to hold off promoting GremlinBin more heavily until you get past proof of concept phase?
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 8:45 AM, Dylan Millikin <dylan.milli...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm obviously biased so I'm just going to add a bit of information here: > > The current version was a bit of a proof of concept. As such the > documentation lacks a bit and code could be a tad cleaner. I'm currently in > the process of modulating the various moving pieces and documenting > everything so that I can put the code up on github for people to > contribute. This should solidify the entire project. > > I've added empty graphs to the current implementation and the next steps > are: > - open source some components (console-js at the very least) > - change the visualization plugin to support larger graphs. > - add the gratefuldead graph and the northwind graph. > - get things working on mobile > > Eventually, it may be interesting to see if starting docker containers/aws > images may be a good way to get rid of the inconsistencies due to > sandboxing and help in allowing for OLAP traversals. Though this implies > heavier resource usage and that would come with a cost. Worth exploring > though. > > > On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 1:13 PM, Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I noticed his morning that we don't have a link to Dylan's GremlinBin on > > the home page. Seems like it's a mistake not to promote such an easy way > > to get started with Gremlin. > > > > I was thinking we could create a "Try Gremlin" logo of some sort for that > > purpose - sound good? > > >
