[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1252?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15229668#comment-15229668 ]
Geoff Reedy commented on TINKERPOP-1252: ---------------------------------------- I should mention that I haven't actually reproduced the problem on 3.2.0-SNAPSHOT, but by inspecting the code determined that it should have the same problem. I finally tracked down this as the root cause for some problems I'd been having on a work project which is using 3.1.1-incubating and had to head home just afterward. Unfortunately since it has to do with transaction conflicts it's hard to reliably reproduce but so far there's one particular workload that is triggering it fairly regularly on our setup. I'll do what I can to verify this fix once I'm back in the office. > Failed Neo4j transaction can leave Neo4jTransaction in inconsistent state > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: TINKERPOP-1252 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1252 > Project: TinkerPop > Issue Type: Bug > Components: neo4j > Affects Versions: 3.1.1-incubating, 3.2.0-incubating > Reporter: Geoff Reedy > Priority: Blocker > > For some transaction conflicts Neo4j will throw a DeadlockDetectedException > from neo4japi.Neo4jTx#close(). When this happens, the thread that suffered > this problem may experience a NotInTransactionException on any further > attempts to interact with the graph > The problem starts when the abnormal termination of neo4japi.Neo4jTx#close() > prevents tp3.Neo4jTransaction's threadLocalTx.remove() from being called. The > calling thread is now associated with a closed neo4japi.Neo4jTx. Now > tinkerpop believes that the thread already has an open transaction but neo4j > considers it to be closed. > I've marked as blocker since there isn't any way to work around the problem > once it has occurred. I know that a code freeze for 3.2.0 is in effect now or > shortly, but hopefully it can be thawed enough to put this in. > The fix is simple and expect to see a pull request shortly. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)