Hi,
SackTest.g_withSackX1_sumX_VX1X_localXoutXknowsX_barrierXnormSackXX_inXknowsX_barrier_sack
@Override
public Traversal<Vertex, Double>
get_g_withSackX1_sumX_VX1X_localXoutXknowsX_barrierXnormSackXX_inXknowsX_barrier_sack(
final Object v1Id) {
TraversalScriptHelper.compute("g.withSack(1.0d,sum).V(${v1Id}).local(out('knows').barrier(normSack)).in('knows').barrier.sack",
g, "v1Id", v1Id)
}
The ${v1Id} should be just v1Id not ${v1Id}
Cheers
Pieter
On 10/04/2016 04:17, Marko Rodriguez wrote:
> Hi Pieter,
>
> What is the SackTest issue you were talking about in your SQLg analysis?
>
> 1 failure,
> GroovySackTest.get_g_withSackX1_sumX_VX1X_localXoutXknowsX_barrierXnormSackXX_inXknowsX_barrier_sack
> has a incorrect variable definition in the groovy string. Fixed it and
> then all passes.
>
> Thanks,
> Marko.
>
> http://markorodriguez.com
>
>
