[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15261181#comment-15261181 ]
Marko A. Rodriguez commented on TINKERPOP-1278: ----------------------------------------------- I'm running into a bunch of meta-programming losing metaMethods stuff with {{TestSuite}}. I think we should do this: 1. Create a {{gremlin-variants}} package. 2. It will have {{VariantTraversalSource}}, {{VariantTraversal}}, {{VariantAnonymousTraversal}}, {{VariantConverter}} in {{main/}}. 3. It will have a version of all the tests, but only needed once for ALL variants. {code} public abstract class VariantSumTest { public static class Traversals extends SumTest { @Override public Traversal<Vertex, Double> get_g_V_valuesXageX_sum() { new VariantTraversalSource(converter,g).V().values("age").sum(); } @Override public Traversal<Vertex, Map<String, Number>> get_g_V_hasLabelXsoftwareX_group_byXnameX_byXbothE_weight_sumX() { new VariantTraversalSource(converter,g).V().hasLabel("software").group().by("name").by(bothE().values("weight").sum(); } } } {code} 4. We will have {{TinkerGraphVariantProvider}}, {{TinkerGraphComputerVariantProvider}} ... in {{test/}}. 5. We will have {{XXXVariantProcessStandardSuite}} and {{XXXVariantProcessComputerSuite}} tests in {{test/}}. 6. All the {{XXXVariantProcessXXXSuites}} will have a static {{VariantConverter}} field. (see its use above) The sucky thing is that we have to copy all the tests over and keep them in sync like we do with Gremlin-Groovy. The benefit is that things are "cleaner" and all this meta-program insanity can chill out a bit. > Support at least 3 Gremlin language variants. > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: TINKERPOP-1278 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1278 > Project: TinkerPop > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 3.2.0-incubating > Reporter: Marko A. Rodriguez > > As discussed on dev@... > Apache TinkerPop should provide, out-of-the-box, at least 3 Gremlin language > variants. It would be cool if these were: > * Python (Mark Henderson) > * PHP ([~PommeVerte]) > * Ruby (?[~okram]) > I think each of these should be generated using the reflection-model > presented in > http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.2.1-SNAPSHOT/tutorials/gremlin-language-variants/. > Moreover, on every {{mvn clean install}}, the code for these variants is > generated. > Given the desire to separate language variants from language drivers, I think > that a language driver for each variant above should be "plugable." Moreover, > we should provide one driver implementation for each -- simple GremlinServer > REST. > {code} > gremlin-variants/ > gremlin-ruby/ > gremlin_ruby.rb > gremlin_ruby_rest_driver.rb > gremlin-php/ > Gremlin_PHP.php > Gremlin_PHP_REST_Driver.php > gremlin-python/ > gremlin-python.py > gremlin-python-rest-driver.py > {code} > Next, each variant implementation should be testable. This is PAINFUL if we > have to implement each {{g_V_out_repeatXasXaXX}} test case in > {{ProcessXXXSuite}}. Perhaps some RegEx transducer magic could be used to > convert all those tests from Gremlin-Java to the respective host language? > However, even if we do that, we still have the problem of how to test the > returned results. > I think what we should test the returned results using the JVM. For instance, > JRuby, Jython, JPHP (does it exist?). If we do this, we will save ourselves a > massive headache. All we have to do is create a {{GraphProvider}} that uses > {{TinkerGraph}} and whose {{TraversalSource}} is some sort of wrapper around > reflection-generated Ruby (e.g.). > {code} > g.V.out_e("knows") // returns a Ruby iterator > {code} > That Ruby iterator should be converted to a Java iterator and then the > {{ProcessXXXSuite}} can verify the results. > With this, most everything is reflectively constructed. > {code} > gremlin_ruby.rb // generated via Java reflection > gremlin_ruby_rest_driver.rb // manually coded > match_test.rb // generated via RegEx transducer > has_test.rb // generated via RegEx transducer > ... > RubyGraphProvider.java // manually coded > RubyProcessStandardSuite.java // manually coded > RubyProcessComputerSuite.java // manually coded > {code} > Thus, the testing data flow would be: > {code} > MatchTest.Traversals.java --transducer-> match_test.rb > match-test.rb --REST--> GremlinServer > GremlinServer --GraphSON-->match-test.rb > GraphSON --JRuby/GraphSONReader-->Java objects > Java objects --JRuby-->MatchTest.java > {code} -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)