gremgo has been added to the list of drivers on the home page.

On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 9:43 AM, Marcus Engvall <engvall.mar...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I agree, I think that if I were to write a potential GLV in Go it would be
> some kind of wrapper around Gremgo, so having a well-functioning driver is
> essential for any further development.
>
> > On 09 May 2016, at 13:23, Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Well - the driver was crucial. Doing that first makes sense to me.
> Without
> > that, the Go GLV itself wouldn't be terribly useful.
> >
> > On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 5:27 PM, Marcus Engvall <engvall.mar...@gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I was considering doing a Gremlin language variant in Golang, but I came
> >> to the conclusion that it would take a lot of time and effort and I am
> not
> >> quite sure how it would be implemented properly. Thus, I decided that
> I’d
> >> focus on making gremgo a driver rather than a language variant seeing as
> >> all I really wanted at the time was an efficient and no-fuss way of
> issuing
> >> queries to Gremlin Server. I may write a language variant in Golang in
> the
> >> future as a separate library, but as of now the priority for me is to
> make
> >> gremgo as a Gremlin driver as fully-functioning as possible.
> >>
> >>> On 8 maj 2016, at 20:27, Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for that explanation. I"m always curious about why new drivers
> and
> >>> libraries pop up for the same language. Sometimes it's because there's
> >>> legitimately something different in the approach, sometimes it's
> because
> >>> the author of the new driver didn't know the existing one was under
> >>> development, etc. I know that the go-gremlin driver was a somewhat
> >>> incomplete work as the author had to move on to other things, so
> perhaps
> >>> that had something to do with the inefficiency.
> >>>
> >>> btw, any thoughts on what it would take to do a Go Gremlin Language
> >> Variant
> >>> (
> >>
> http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.2.1-SNAPSHOT/tutorials/gremlin-language-variants/
> >>> ) to pair with gremgo?
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Marcus Engvall <
> >> engvall.mar...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I was originally planning on using the other driver (
> >>>> https://github.com/go-gremlin/gremlin <
> >>>> https://github.com/go-gremlin/gremlin>) for a project, but upon
> >> examining
> >>>> the code I discovered that the library opens a new connection every
> >> time it
> >>>> makes a request and does not have a connection pool to keep existing
> >>>> connections alive. The result is an inefficient driver that would
> >> probably
> >>>> bottleneck as it scales, so I wrote a new driver designed with scale
> and
> >>>> concurrency in mind which uses basic connection pooling and an
> extensive
> >>>> use of goroutines to maintain efficiency.
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 8 maj 2016, at 15:44, Stephen Mallette <spmalle...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks for sharing your work here. I don't see a problem adding it if
> >>>>> others don't. It will be nice to reference a Go driver and have
> >> coverage
> >>>>> for that language.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> As a separate question, is there any difference between your work and
> >>>> this
> >>>>> Go driver: https://github.com/go-gremlin/gremlin
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 8:45 AM, Marcus Engvall <
> >> engvall.mar...@gmail.com
> >>>>>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Hello,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I’m working on a driver for Gremlin Server in Golang and I recently
> >>>>>> released a working version of it on GitHub (
> >>>>>> https://github.com/qasaur/gremgo <https://github.com/qasaur/gremgo
> >).
> >>>> It
> >>>>>> is still in an early development phase, but it works fine for basic
> >>>>>> querying to the database at the moment and is designed in a way to
> >> allow
> >>>>>> for fast concurrent querying.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> With that being said, I was wondering if it would be possible to
> list
> >>>>>> gremgo as a Golang driver on the TinkerPop main page? I looked over
> >>>> some of
> >>>>>> the requirements for listing a driver and it looks like gremgo
> >> fulfills
> >>>>>> these requirements. If not, I'd be happy to hear any concerns.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>> Marcus
> >>
> >>
> >>
>

Reply via email to