DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37929>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37929 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-12-16 09:34 ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Hi William, > Thanks for looking into this so quickly. > The situation is the same as the one you encountered > with Kin-Man on bug 35351: > >> Just to be clear, is this patch is still covered by your CCLA? In English, is > >> this a grant from glassfish to that ASF? > >> > > This is just a patch, and there is no license or copyright, so YES. > Let me know if you need anything else. I accepted Kin-Man's patch based on the fact that he is a Tomcat committer, and as such should have a CCLA on file with the ASF. If that is still valid, than that means that Sun has trusted him with deciding about donating Sun code to the ASF. Were I to find out that Kin-Man's CCLA has been revoked, I would revert the commit in a heart-beat :). IANAL, but from all of the ASF lists that I have followed, the above reasoning doesn't even hold a drop of water. So again I ask if you have a CCLA on file so that the ASF can accept your donation of Sun's code? The patch is nice, so I'm hoping that you say yes ;-). -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
