Remy Maucherat wrote: > Mark Thomas wrote: >> I thought about doing it that way but I wanted to catch the difference >> between Content-Length defaulting to -1 and the page developer >> explicitly setting it to -1. It is an edge case I admit but I don't >> see any harm in covering it given where the implementation now sits. > > > I don't think Content-Length: -1 is a valid value for the header in the > response. Since the header is treated as special, I also don't think a > header will be added to the response in that case.
You are right. I was mixing up my specs. Patch to follow. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
