DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37356>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37356 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-07 15:40 ------- Do you mean that wo browsers use the same session to access a page, or just the ( quite usual ) case that two people use the web application? A: not the same session. Different IE browser will generate differnt session ID. That means in the included application B and C you get the session from application A? Application != context for you? A: yes. So it seems that the common ground for all of us here is, that we have some objects in the session that implement the HttpSessionBindingListener or HttpSessionActivationListener. A: I did not put any object implement the HttpSessionBindingLisener or HttpSessionActivationListener in the session. I think with different thread ( when include the page in other application), when it will operate the session object, it will not synchronize the session object (or its filed accessCount). -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
