isn't it easier to give each user a pre-configured lightweight but own tomcat?
leon On 4/6/06, Preston L. Bannister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, that is one definition of "real applications". There are other > definitions. :) > > > On 4/6/06, Tino Schwarze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 09:15:17AM -0700, Preston L. Bannister wrote: > > > > > You have to consider how (or if) to allow for long-running background > > > threads. Successive requests for the same user will not use the JVM > > > (whether this counts as an advantage or disadvantage is debatable). The > > JVM > > > isn't going to be optimizing code. > > > > The point of using an application server (instead of e.g. PHP) is that > > it maintains state on the server. You lose this by using fork(). So it's > > not going to work at all for real applications since your application > > "returns" to it's previous state after every request. > > > > Bye, Tino. > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
