Bill Barker wrote:
"William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Whoa :)  I don't see a vote thread?

alpha, beta, gamma, gold, it doesn't matter... any "tarball release" from the Apache Software Foundation must be preceeded by a vote. <snip long explanation>


Long established practice in Tomcat-land: The 5.5.17 release is currently nothing but a tarball (and, so we call it Alpha). Yoav will probably call a vote later in the week, or next. At that point it will get a GA/Beta/Still Alpha rating.

Aye I understand that - I'm stating it's not valid at the ASF to push something
at Announce@ anylist until dev@ makes a (initial) decision, e.g. you could do
the first vote for alpha, second vote for beta, third vote for GA, or ballot all
three choices (choosing the 'best' rating with 3 +1 and more + than -, or what
have you).  How you vote is up to the project.  Not voting isn't a choice within
the foundation.  Essentially, the RM personally hangs their ass out to dry by
posting such an announcement, because the ASF protection ("It's -our- code, not
a specific individuals - yell at -us-, we'll duke it out in court etc") only
kicks in once the voting process is followed.

Bill

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to