https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60645
--- Comment #4 from ba...@semedy.com --- (In reply to Christopher Schultz from comment #3) > Could this class have been written as a subclass of StatementFinalizer that > simply overrides all the methods with synchronized versions and delegates to > the superclass? That would be less code to maintain. The new StatementFinalizer class also replaces the LinkedList with an ArrayList (but this is not the important change - I think it would also be okay if you would keep the original LinkedList implementation). But why would you want to keep both the original StatementFinalizer class and the thread-safe StatementFinalizer class? I think it would be really good to have just one StatementFinalizer class which is thread-safe. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
