https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62615
Mark Thomas <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID OS| |All --- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas <[email protected]> --- The provided test case is significantly more than the minimum necessary to reproduce the issue. "mvn package" fails. Re-creating the test as a Tomcat unit test does not demonstrate a memory leak. No evidence (i.e. a reference chain) has been provided to demonstrate that a memory leak exists. This is the second report claiming a memory leak where: - a huge test case has been provided - 'mvn package' fails - no evidence of a memory leak can be found A significant amount of time has been spend investigating these reports that could have been better spent elsewhere. Based on this experience, future reports along these lines are likely to be resolved as invalid without investigation unless the quality of the reports improves. As a minimum, future reports should be provided as a WAR (with full source) for the server and a stand-alone Java application (in source form) for the client. Better still, would be in the form of a patch to the Tomcat unit tests. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
