-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 All,
On 10/23/18 10:05, Christopher Schultz wrote: > Can I get a technical review for (a) appropriateness and (b) > technical implementation of the attached cluster interceptor? Let's > assume for a moment that encryption is something worth adding to > clustering and not argue that point. > > It should be straightforward. Knowing virtually nothing about the > way that Tribes works, implementing this as an interceptor seemed > like the least invasive (and easiest!) way to add encryption to > clustering. For the record, I haven't tested this AT ALL. I just made it compile :) If someone has a test-cluster available, could you please try to add this (it just requires an "encryptionKey" attribute on the interceptor... just use "cafebabe" or something simple) and see if (a) the messages flow properly and (b) they transmit in non-plaintext? Thanks, - -chris -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - https://www.enigmail.net/ iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEMmKgYcQvxMe7tcJcHPApP6U8pFgFAlvPgRMACgkQHPApP6U8 pFgROg//db0iK87mkSIVs/so72nemDkmUjjz158ccjl8AT7cLzEbEanPB0/3TghT lKuQKeQRD97xYbNbFCxoWdowkaEt25w0Qpl3mht363jFdF9xPLCYMj7xtLc7brv6 m/KTHhcbsBb4cgkOK1o6gcbzKUmPB2v5IWhIPG09Aa9rce2yT9TNjAyyARqcOdp0 tuh0jT8ksvuojM6u9hfOvrK8xO5GX223ljPCHNBQvqprqOaOtoKfN349BvZx3MvZ vwn+cn5fKbmU6hucq5X0kBVg7r4SbhGt3+S3a7VLfl3cWAxf3jzkq45KHsB8/gON RoI2AqDqD9w9pDQ1CZAG953nAFAnKDR1xng63MDNgD05w34hkGloMe4ytJjX4tLL kOr0vx1pqfKSYEqTzoJUfTzgaKmDW7WBYNM/JsrJ+jG+Y0/xdQDIvyEsBgozVVWK bIMXibAviXHypnY1UfhVgJgpgWwhra+XGJEbGYHEtQijClM0NRaERsQaVGCxbkbA ncbi0EwHw2MC5cRZZdY38sxPbYVk9omcQywTiaIHxtQA0FZxRP/r/NNMnw5X2UXA 7+ox7mrjpleaf6dB2CxNl5Yc/186wqSicsw93ekLNm1RyuN0bHOQzyKJ/rWMae+S wt9iED9aidu4go4fKplugb436KSHVSksVcFwnjDX0aEj1Dq/T70= =5+TL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
