Remy/Filip,

Thanks for your input. I'll update the bug report with a brief summary
and come back to this later.

Mark

Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> You can still cluster just using AOP without ever involving the manager,
> hence such solutions would be affected by this new behavior.
> at most, when a webapp is shutdown, you can call passivate, but not
> invalidate the sessions.
> Filip
> 
> Remy Maucherat wrote:
>> Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
>>> it will cause problems for clustered stuff, not sure that container
>>> shutdown means session invalidation.
>>> for example, if you invalidate the session, such a change would
>>> trickle through the cluster, and that might not be intentional.
>>> I suggest we leave the behavior as is, or at least configurable if we
>>> mean to change it
>>
>> The clustered manager most likely would have the opportunity to
>> override the code which would do the expiration, I think.
>>
>> Rémy
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to