Remy/Filip, Thanks for your input. I'll update the bug report with a brief summary and come back to this later.
Mark Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: > You can still cluster just using AOP without ever involving the manager, > hence such solutions would be affected by this new behavior. > at most, when a webapp is shutdown, you can call passivate, but not > invalidate the sessions. > Filip > > Remy Maucherat wrote: >> Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: >>> it will cause problems for clustered stuff, not sure that container >>> shutdown means session invalidation. >>> for example, if you invalidate the session, such a change would >>> trickle through the cluster, and that might not be intentional. >>> I suggest we leave the behavior as is, or at least configurable if we >>> mean to change it >> >> The clustered manager most likely would have the opportunity to >> override the code which would do the expiration, I think. >> >> Rémy >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]