ChristopherSchultz commented on a change in pull request #218: WIP: BZ 63835:
Add support for Keep-Alive header
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/218#discussion_r338125259
##########
File path: java/org/apache/coyote/http11/Http11Processor.java
##########
@@ -915,8 +915,26 @@ protected final void prepareResponse() throws IOException
{
headers.addValue(Constants.CONNECTION).setString(
Constants.CLOSE);
}
- } else if (!http11 && !getErrorState().isError()) {
-
headers.addValue(Constants.CONNECTION).setString(Constants.KEEPALIVE);
+ } else if (!getErrorState().isError()) {
+ if (!http11) {
+
headers.addValue(Constants.CONNECTION).setString(Constants.KEEPALIVE);
+ }
+
+ boolean connectionKeepAlivePresent =
+ isConnectionToken(request.getMimeHeaders(),
Constants.KEEPALIVE);
+
+ if (connectionKeepAlivePresent) {
+ int keepAliveTimeout = protocol.getKeepAliveTimeout();
+
+ if (keepAliveTimeout > 0) {
Review comment:
Did we decide that supporting a non-standard response header was a good idea?
Should we use `Constants.KEEP_ALIVE` (or even `Constants.KEEPALIVE`) for the
string instead of a string value, here?
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
With regards,
Apache Git Services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
