DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38131>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38131 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-26 23:47 ------- (In reply to comment #1) > First, I'm changing this to an enhancement, as the current code is clearly > designed for absolute paths so what you're reporting is not a bug. I get my infos from documentation and not from the source - and in the docs I havn't found any info that you need absolute paths. > ... > I'm guessing in your case the docBase is relative, not absolute, so the method > uses appBase as the context for docBase, and since your webapp is outside > appBase this doesn't work. Is my guess right? Does it work if you make your > docBase absolute? My docBase is absolute like <Context docBase="${somedir}/appdir"> and ${somedir} is absolute like "c:/webapps". And it doesn't work with <WatchedResource>WEB-INF/web.xml</WatchedResource> in conf/context.xml, and it also doesn_t work with <WatchedResource>c:/webapps/appdir/WEB-INF/web.xml</WatchedResource> in conf/context.xml. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
