https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64871
--- Comment #2 from Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> --- The previous issue hadn't been forgotten. I'll mark it as a duplicate of this one shortly. Since the original issue was raised, the resource handling has been significantly refactored. It looks like it will be possible to catch files being ignored because of symlinks in a single place. It seems unlikely to me that users would want a symlink to be ignored otherwise why create the symlink in the fist place? I am therefore experimenting with logging an error message whenever a file is ignored due to it being accessed via a symlink. I do think SEVERE is too excessive for the general case. It is probably appropriate for some files (like web.xml) but I don't want to start down the path of checking for files names before deciding on the log level. WARN seems reasonable. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
