On 19/12/2020 00:16, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Mladen,
On 12/18/20 15:10, Mladen Turk wrote:
It can be used for various deployments.
Apache Tomcat can use catalina.bat directly
for running service ... more details at
https://github.com/mturk/svcbatch/blob/master/docs/examples/apachetomcat.md
I'd love to get some feedback from folks
that are using Apache Tomcat on Windows platform.
I don't generally use Windows, so I don't have a horse in this race, but I'm
curious as to the complaints against procrun versus what SvcBatch provides. Can
you give some examples of problems that SvcBatch solves?
The major problem it solves is single point of configuration.
SvcBatch uses catalina.bat to run Tomcat, so there is no
need for additional configuration which Procrun saves in registry.
Also using GUI for configuration is unproductive
when there are many instances that need to be configured,
and particularly for servers versions that do not have GUI.
The process for SvcBatch seems to be fairly similar to that of procrun.
Nope. They are quite far apart.
Regards
--
^TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
