On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 13:56 -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > > > > These types of bumps are minor, and I like to test myself in my own > > envs. So can't hurt to make it available for others to test etc. > > +1 on testing that the packages all build in advance of any release, > just please don't represent these as releases. Until you see those > 3 +1's and an announce, they are not.
Sure, I don't call them releases at all. Almost always mention what they are in logs as well, cvs and package changelog. Nor will I request stabilization of anything that is not an official release. No stable alpha's, beta's, etc. Granted this one I should have tagged _pre, or etc, so it might appear as a full release. Most people using ~arch on Gentoo, know they are running unstable where testing and breakage takes place. So it's not uncommon for snapshot/cvs/svn/dev/alpha/beta/etc stuff to go in there. Just ideally package name reflects that. Totally my bad with this one ;) If it's release soon enough will be moot. Otherwise I will go and rename package, and remove other one with incorrect name. -- William L. Thomson Jr. Gentoo/Java
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
