> Dominik Pospisil wrote: > > So I am thinking if this could not be the problem. Is is necessary to be > > this implementation synchronized? > > Given the implementation, you are not supposed to be using instance > listeners at this time except for debugging purposes. > > Since InstanceSupport is array based, I don't see the point of the > sync+clone which happens in there. > > Rémy
Rémy, thanks for fixing that issue. In my test I can see ~30% improvement in number of concurrent sessions correctly served by single Tomcat instance. But still it did not solved it completely. My idea is, that if there are enough memory and IO resources, Tomcat will be able to handle all the clients "equally". So if there are clients which produce equal constant load they should be served all and with the same average response times. Do you think that it is achievable? The question is what should "equally" exactly mean. I know that in real scenario there are various clients with different connections and injection rates so just a simple FIFO rule would not be sufficient. Moreover, I am new to Tomcat internals and at this point I have no idea of how it should work at all. But what about general idea of having some scheduler which will somehow control thread execution? Is it good idea or something completely wrong? Thanks for any comments, Dominik --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
