Mark,

On 8/15/22 06:10, bugzi...@apache.org wrote:
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66209

--- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> ---
This patch essentially trades memory for performance. We have some users that
won't want to make that trade - even if the memory concerned is relatively
small.

Given the competing demands here, I think we need to find a way to make this
configurable. Whether that is by expanding useBloomFilterForArchives beyond a
simple boolean, by tweaking the background processing frequency or by a new
configuration option is TBD. I want to mull this over a little bit before
making any changes.

+1

true = use the bloom filter as exists today
false = do not use the bloom filter
wankel = use the bloom filter with cach-purges

-chris

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Reply via email to