On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 12:17 PM Mark Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 27/09/2022 11:15, Mark Thomas wrote: > > On 27/09/2022 10:31, Rémy Maucherat wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 11:23 AM Mark Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> On 27/09/2022 03:42, Han Li wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> 2022年9月26日 23:07，Rémy Maucherat <[email protected]> 写道： > >>>>> > >>>>> On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 4:51 PM Mark Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Hi all, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Now 10.1.x is stable, how to we want to handle 10.0.x? Than plan has > >>>>>> always been that we would support 10.0.x until 10.1.x was stable. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Assuming the vote passes (we need 1 more +1) then there will be a > >>>>>> 10.0.26 release. Do we want that to be the last 10.0.x. release? If, > >>>>>> not, how many more 10.0.x releases should there be? > >>>>> > >>>>> I'm not against stopping at 10.0.26 and directing people to 10.1. > >>>> > >>>> +1 > >>> > >>> Given the regressions, I'm now thinking we do 10.0.27 at the start of > >>> October (i.e. start the release process next week) and - assuming no > >>> issues - make that the final release. > >> > >> Ok, but I'll have trouble doing a release cycle next week. Since there > >> is a bad regression I would need to do 9.0.68 now. > > > > Understood. Can you give me a few hours to update the translations etc? > > Or we wait until the following week. > > Or I could do the 9.0.x release. > > Or ... ?
Or you can do the 9.0 release next week (along with 10.0 and 10.1). So you have all the options on the table now I believe. Rémy > Mark > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
