Hi,

As an user we are adopting Tomcat 11 (even if still "on the edge") with
Java 17 (in particular for some lib/stacks) and the more reactive servlet
6.1 is very interesting so hope it can be made Java 17 compliant until
technically blocked.

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
<https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>


Le mer. 11 janv. 2023 à 12:44, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> a écrit :

> On 11/01/2023 11:38, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 12:23 PM Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> <snip/>
>
> >> The target date for Jakarta EE 11 is Q1 2024. Given that there are no
> >> Java 21 features we want to use in Tomcat 11 right now I suggest we wait
> >> until we need to build Tomcat 11 with Java 21 to decide what to do.
> >> Worst case, we'll need to build most branches with Java 21 and 8.5.x
> >> with Java 17 until 8.5.x reaches EOL (31 March 2024).
> >
> > If Java 21 is the baseline, I would like to propose to drop
> > tomcat-native from Tomcat 11 and replace it with Panama. This is of
> > course assuming Panama is non preview in 21, and this also needs to
> > wait for some time (probably until June).
>
> Just playing devils advocate for a second, is Java 21 going to be too
> big a leap for the majority of users? Might the Tomcat community be
> better with Java 17 as the minimum version for Tomcat 11?
>
> Personally, I am in favour of Java 21 for Tomcat 11. There is always
> Tomcat 10.1x for those that don't want to / can't move to Java 21. But I
> did at least want to ask the question in case my views are in the minority.
>
> Mark
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to