https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67080
--- Comment #13 from Anurag Dubey <anura...@amazon.com> --- (In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #11) > (In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #8) > > The alternative approach is not faster. The test that showed it was was not > > a fair test. I will be applying a variation of the original patch. > > To be clear the original patch/approach from John Engebretson is faster than > alternative patch/approach proposed by Anurag Dubey. > > Both are faster than binary search. I agree that the earlier test shared for Alternative enum lookup approach didn't involve a switch lookup. I have created another test involving switch after the enum lookup, which looks faster than other 2, thoughts on this ? Benchmark Mode Cnt Score Error Units LookupVsSwitch.binarySearch thrpt 15 12.175 ? 0.472 ops/us LookupVsSwitch.fromLookupAndSwitch thrpt 15 19.759 ? 0.878 ops/us LookupVsSwitch.fromSwitch thrpt 15 15.106 ? 0.520 ops/us -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
