https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68558
--- Comment #3 from Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> --- Thanks for the additional info. I'll try and address each part in turn. 1. Caching the key fields is low cost as it is just a reference to an existing String. I think that is a better solution that trying to cache in MessageBytes/ByteChunk/CharChunk due to the cache invalidation complexities. I think we can do this quickly. 2. Could you provide examples. If there is any low-hanging fruit similar to1 that should be easy to address. 3. Ah. Got it. That is going to be a little trickier to address. I suspect some refactoring will be required as we have to take account of the parameter merging rules. Not sure how easy that will be. My plan at this stage is to address the low hanging fruit and then switch this to an enhancement (strictly this is all an enhancement) for the parameter refactoring. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
