On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 5:25 PM Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote: > > On 16/08/2024 13:40, Tim Funk wrote: > > How about missingEqualsCookie="allow | ignore"? > > The proposed options were: > - ignore > - name > - value
Ok, I think your proposed options are very good. Thanks for the summary. Personally I would have interpreted these as name rather than value, so it helped clarify. I also think you are right about not changing the behavior for current branches. It could be changed to ignore already in 11, and we could see if people start complaining ? Rémy > > By using [allow | ignore] instead of yes/no, it opens the door to > > additional behaviors. (such as reject which triggers a http error) > > Agreed. > > Mark > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
