https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69362

--- Comment #10 from Michael Osipov <micha...@apache.org> ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #9)
> My reading of RFC 4918 is if we have a status code for baz it should be 424.
> 
> Quoting from RFC 2119:
>    SHOULD NOT   This phrase, or the phrase "NOT RECOMMENDED" mean that
>    there may exist valid reasons in particular circumstances when the
>    particular behavior is acceptable or even useful, but the full
>    implications should be understood and the case carefully weighed
>    before implementing any behavior described with this label.
> 
> If we have valid reasons to include a status code it should be 424. My
> preference is for your counter proposal to add a comment and continue to
> omit the status for parent resources in this case.

This is what my counter-proposal does, not behavioral change, just add better
docs. That's it.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Reply via email to