On Sun, Nov 9, 2025 at 5:42 PM Rainer Jung <[email protected]> wrote: > > Am 06.11.25 um 09:26 schrieb Rémy Maucherat: > > The proposed Apache Tomcat 9.0.112 release is now available for voting. > > > > The notable changes compared to 9.0.111 are: > > > > - Fix SSL socket factory configuration in the JNDI realm. Based on a > > pull request by Joshua Rogers. > > > > - Fix a memory leak when using a trust store with the OpenSSL provider. > > Pull request by aogburn. > > > > For full details, see the changelog: > > https://nightlies.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-9.0.x/docs/changelog.html > > > > It can be obtained from: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-9/v9.0.112/ > > > > The Maven staging repo is: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomcat-1570 > > > > The tag is: > > https://github.com/apache/tomcat/tree/9.0.112 > > f2263db7a592f43aa1faa9408ecfeb5d9f83b75f > > > > The proposed 9.0.112 release is: > > [ ] -1, Broken - do not release > > [X] +1, Stable - go ahead and release as 9.0.112 > > +1 to release. > > Reproducibility of the build checked (including the Windows installer) > on Linux Mint 22.2. OK after setting LANG. Checked manually plus with > "ant verify-release". > > Original Windows installer signature verified with osslsigncode. > > dist file list correct, hashes OK, gpg signatures OK. > > Unit tests ran on platforms > > - RHEL 8, 9 and 10, SLES 15, Solaris 10 and 11 > > using > > - recent patch versions of JDK 1.8.0, 11, 17, 21, 25 and 26 (EA 22) > > from > > - Eclipse Adoptium, Azul Zulu, Amazon Coretto, Oracle, RedHat and > OpenJDK (for 26) > > where available. > > Also tested with > > - tcnative 1.3.1, 2.0.9 and panama > > based on > > - OpenSSL 3.0.18, 3.4.3, 3.5.4 and 3.6.0. > > All test runs fine, except for > > - the usual sporadic crashes with tcnative during shutdown. > > - org.apache.catalina.startup.TestStartupIPv6Connectors fails for Java 8 > (all vendors, all linux variants) in test testIPv6LinkLocal. No failures > for Java 11, 17, 21 and 25! Details:
Is this new ? You reported nothing bad on 9.0.110. Rémy > > expected:<200> but was:<400> > junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:<200> but was:<400> > at > org.apache.catalina.startup.TestStartupIPv6Connectors.assertHttpOkOnAddress(TestStartupIPv6Connectors.java:111) > at > org.apache.catalina.startup.TestStartupIPv6Connectors.testIPv6LinkLocal(TestStartupIPv6Connectors.java:51) > > 07-Nov-2025 17:45:17.114 INFO [main] > org.apache.coyote.AbstractProtocol.start Starting ProtocolHandler > ["http-nio-fe80:0:0:0:5054:ff:fe68:9913%enp1s0-auto-3-36525"] > 07-Nov-2025 17:45:17.143 INFO > [http-nio-fe80:0:0:0:5054:ff:fe68:9913%enp1s0-auto-3-exec-1] > org.apache.coyote.AbstractProcessor.parseHost The host > [[fe80:0:0:0:5054:ff:fe68:9913%enp1s0]:36525] is not valid > Note: further occurrences of request parsing errors will be logged at > DEBUG level. > java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: The character [%] is never > valid in an IPv6 address. > at > org.apache.tomcat.util.http.parser.HttpParser.readHostIPv6(HttpParser.java:901) > at > org.apache.tomcat.util.http.parser.Host.parse(Host.java:71) > at > org.apache.tomcat.util.http.parser.Host.parse(Host.java:43) > at > org.apache.coyote.AbstractProcessor.parseHost(AbstractProcessor.java:297) > at > org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.prepareRequest(Http11Processor.java:787) > at > org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.service(Http11Processor.java:375) > > Thanks for RM! > > Best regards, > > Rainer > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
