Remy Maucherat wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Author: markt >> Date: Sat Aug 4 21:12:49 2007 >> New Revision: 562818 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=562818 >> Log: >> Add license to a file I missed. > > All this "adding license header" in non source resources does not make > sense to me, since you cannot do it in everything (images ...). > Configuration files should also not be restricted by the ASL, and not > subject to copyright.
It comes down to what you consider a source file. The current proposed definition from http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/3party.html#define-source, "the preferred form of the work for making modifications", includes just about everything we check into svn. Rather than start another marathon thread on legal-discuss whether this definition is correct and whether each of the non-.java files is really a source file, it was less effort to use the re-license tool to update the files. Your point about images is an interesting one. There are also a few other file types I couldn't add the text too for various reasons. I'll push all of these over to legal-discuss. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
