On Sep 10, 2007, at 8:00 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:How about: o CTR on trunk o Various release branches are made (ala httpd, apr, etc...). These include a STATUS file. o All code applied to the release branch is under lazy consensus but *must* be specified in STATUS. (eg: "I plan on applying rev786987 in 3 days under lazy consensus"). Not as stringent as RTC, but also provides a good level of oversight with a minimum of overhead... RTC can be maintained for older, stable releases.Still -1. It provides no more oversight than RTC
I have no idea how you could possibly justify that statement. With RTC one *requires* 3 +1 votes. The above does not. And STATUS is there to indicate what *will* be done, not what *has* been done. It's usually a good idea to actually read and understand posts before automatically disagreeing with them :) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
