Mark Thomas wrote: > Jim Jagielski wrote: >> [X] +1. Yes, the above works and addresses my concerns >> as well as the problems which started this whole >> thing. >> [ ] 0. Whatever. >> [ ] -1. The above does not work for the following reasons: >> > > With the following caveats: > > - There is only one dev branch. I am -1 for creating separate dev > branches for 3.3.x, 4.1.x, 5.0.x and 5.5.x on the grounds it is too much > overhead for branches that are in maintenance mode where 99% of the > patches will be ported from 6.x
Apache httpd works that way. In case a patch can't fit in mail use people.apache.org to store the patch to review. Note that tomcat/tc6.0.x/ is a released branche and it should be RTC too. Cheers Jean-Frederic > > - Where a patch for 3, 4 or 5 is required that just doesn't make sense > in the dev branch then the patch is applied using RTC. > > - We review this process in 3 months time to see if it is providing the > expected benefits without excessive overheads. > > - We improve the "Which version?" web page to make clear which branches > are supported and at what level. I'll start a wiki page as a draft of this. > > - The "Get involved" pages are updated to document this process > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
