Well and what about JPackage compatibity ?
2008/2/7, Jason Brittain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > People may easily change that if they'd like. But, it was a > repeatedly requested > change -- too many users were complaining that they weren't able to install > other Tomcat RPMs because of dependencies they couldn't meet, and they > wished they had a package that didn't have that "problem". They already had > Java installed, and it wasn't necessarily installed as an RPM package, and it > wasn't necessarily Sun's Java. They just wanted to set JAVA_HOME and be > done with that. You would be surprised how many users were asking for it to > be this way. Also, it would be easy to customize the spec file of this > package > and rebuild it to depend on the Java one wants it to depend on. It would be > a 1 line change to the RPM spec file. > > -- > Jason > > > On Feb 7, 2008 9:58 AM, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 07:42 -0800, Jason Brittain wrote: > > > - Zero RPM package dependencies on any other RPM packages, for ease > > > of installation as a single file (other than Java itself, which you > > > already have). > > > > Hum, that last feature doesn't look so good to me :( > > > > Rémy > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > -- > Jason Brittain > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
