DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44454>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44454 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-20 16:36 ------- optimistic/pessimistic: that's right. As I said, switching to ptimistic will most likely not help with this issue, but I would expect less risk for other issues. graceful: I was thinking about graceful restarts, which let threads end their request, but thought they might not be able to decrease the busy counter in the shared memory any more. As you said, that does not seem to be the reason for your problem. Another comment: the busy count is not really what's used by the Busyness method. We still use what's called "V" in the status output. It should be the same as busyness, in case all load factors are 1, and otherwise some bigger numbers indicating weighted busyness. As you observe problems in the balancing, I expect the "V" values to get inflated as well. Right? The factor by which V differs from busy is shown as multiplicity "M" in the status output. Thos are integers which have the same ratios for the different workers as 1/(load factor). -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
