Mark Thomas wrote: > Rainer Jung wrote: >> Hi, >> >> we now have tcnative 1.1.x and trunk. What's our goal w.r.t. API stability? > > My understanding was that trunk was created to introduce APR 1.3 and > that the result would be tcnative 1.2.x.
APR 1.3 is abi compatible to 1.2 - although you famously adopt internal functions which have no API compatibility contract. If tcnative 1.2 is simply to demand APR 1.3 as a minimum version consuming some new API's, this make sense, but backporting to tcnative 1.1 would seem silly. Keep tcnative 1.2 abi-compatible to tcnative 1.1 (JNI perspective) and drop 1.1, start shipping 1.2 only. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
