On 24.03.2009 15:20, r...@apache.org wrote:
Author: remm
Date: Tue Mar 24 14:20:44 2009
New Revision: 757818
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=757818&view=rev
Log:
- Votes.
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt?rev=757818&r1=757817&r2=757818&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt (original)
+++ tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt Tue Mar 24 14:20:44 2009
@@ -110,6 +110,7 @@
(r697192), now also for the other AJP connectors.
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=757708&view=rev
+1: rjung
+ 0: remm: see below
-1:
* Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45026
@@ -118,6 +119,13 @@
(r697183), now also for the other AJP connectors.
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=757721&view=rev
+1: rjung
+ 0: remm
+ These two fixes remind me of JBoss Web (r795 in the JBW svn), and it
would be
+ nice to ack that (I ack porting of all Tomcat patches, with clear
attribution).
+ I also think a (c) notice in the NOTICE file if porting becomes a habit
(these two
+ are probably not significant enough).
+ From what I know, nobody uses these two connectors in Tomcat, so it did
not seem
+ "port worthy" to me.
-1:
* Backport cleanup of semantics of thisAccessedTime and
Jean-Frederic told me about that this morning after I committed.
I did the implementation yesterday due to going through the status files
for 5.5 and 6 and looking for missing parts concerning myself.
The patches were easy ports of my previous commit on the other
connectors. I did not have *any* knowledge about your patch when I did
the work yesterday. It would have been nice to contribute your patch
before I did the same work duplicate. It seems a bit late now.
Regards,
Rainer
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
