Hi Rémy,
On 27.03.2009 16:48, [email protected] wrote:
@@ -152,7 +144,7 @@
This is not for invalidation, only for displaying
idle times and making persistance decisions.
+1: rjung, markt
- -1:
+ -1: remm: no for TC 6.0
You think it's too risky w.r.t. the 6.0 stability, or do you have
anything more specific in mind?
I was somehow astonished, that the semantics of the two fields were
broken, when I did the change for trunk, that's why I proposed them for
backport.
Regards,
Rainer
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
