As you might see from the SVN log I added few more dist files. The newly created files are:
apache-tomcat-7.0.0-dev-win32-x86-native.zip apache-tomcat-7.0.0-dev-win64-ia64-native.zip apache-tomcat-7.0.0-dev-win64-x86_64-native.zip I have also removed the .exe, .dll and service.bat from the apache-tomcat-7.0.0-dev.zip and apache-tomcat-7.0.0-dev.tar.gz respectively, since they are now inside *-native.zip. Anyone has any problems with files naming? (except Bill of course ;) I'm still vague about x86_64 vs x64, and win64 vs windows, since the first one is standard linux way of naming the amd64/emt64 packages. However such standard doesn't exist on Windows, although Sun recently uses x64 instead amd64 for windows so we might adopt the similar naming. eg: apache-tomcat-7.0.0-dev-windows-x86-native.zip apache-tomcat-7.0.0-dev-windows-ia64-native.zip apache-tomcat-7.0.0-dev-windows-x64-native.zip JRockit names that windows-ia32, windows-x64 and windows-ipf(?), Harmony names windows-x86-32 (I suppose the windows-x86-64 is coming), so more mess in the scene ;) There is still one issue to be solved for .nsi installer script, and that is to allow 32-bit JVM on 64-bit platform. This will probably end up with selection box for all installed JVM's found instead always showing the default one. IMO the *-native.zip files patch is safe for bacport on 5.5 and 6.0, so I'll make a standard VOTE proposal for that, when we settle the package naming. Regards -- ^(TM) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
