-1 to fixing cosmetic changes for TC 6 (If I can vote that is. :). Filip has a good point and I concur.
Thanks, Pejus On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <devli...@hanik.com > wrote: > On 12/17/2009 08:38 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > >> On 16/12/2009 21:31, sebb wrote: >> >> >>> Eclipse generates many thousands of warnings for the Tomcat6 code. >>> >>> For example, over 2000 missing @Override markers, over 3000 "raw type" >>> warnings. >>> >>> Is it the intention to fix these (eventually)? >>> >>> >> Speaking personally, I have no intention of spending any time on these >> at all. There are more important things to fix, like actual bugs, than >> these cosmetic changes. >> >> > I'd also -1 any cosmetic changes, since they make troubleshooting really > hard after the SVN diffs no longer come out clean, but have potentially > thousands of changed lines. > I would consider that a technical veto for a change that brings close to no > value. > > Filip > > Mark >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org >> >> >> >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org > >
