On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Henri Gomez <henri.go...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If we goes back to the original thread and using Hyperic stuff in a > servlet filter or whatever Tomcat extension ? > > Absolutely - a filter would be perfect and will work with any servlet engine. There are some problems with making sure this doesn't leak out - i.e. an X-header inserted by mod_proxy and make sure it filters X-headers from the response. > Could it be usefull for jk, mod_proxy, mod_cluster ? > > Or a specific servlet should/could be provided for such collect > purpose and it Will be called by remote at it's own rate ? > That would work too, even better - a status servlet, which may provide additional data, like number of sessions, java memory, etc. Don't we have one already - dumping all jmx data ? Probably need to output data in an easier to parse format, and I guess mod_proxy configuration would be a bit tricky if you want to use multiple variables, but doable. Costin > > 2010/2/18, Costin Manolache <cos...@gmail.com>: > > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 12:00 AM, jean-frederic clere > > <jfcl...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > >> On 02/17/2010 10:46 PM, Costin Manolache wrote: > >> > On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Mladen Turk <mt...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> > > >> >> On 02/17/2010 07:37 PM, Costin Manolache wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Mladen Turk<mt...@apache.org> > >> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> The reasons I suggest using SPDY as a replacement for AJP - and > >> supporting > >> >>> SPDY > >> >>> > >> >> > >> >> I have nothing against SPDY and it really looks cool, > >> >> but IMHO it's doesn't look and feel like the rest of RFC > >> >> protocol specifications. > >> >> If you can push those guys to create a well known RFC-like > >> >> doc, I'm sure that overall internet community will benefit > >> >> from it. > >> >> > >> > > >> > SPDY is still in development - there is an open mailing list and > >> > quite a few proposals/changes/discussions. I would guess > >> > the end result will end up as a RFC-like. Feel free to join the > >> > mailing list and push or volunteer for anything :-) > >> > > >> > The implementations - chrome, mod_spdy are also open source > >> > and with ASF-like license. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> >> OTOH we are discussing this 'protocol thing' for years instead like > >> >> you noticed we concentrate on the tasks we wish to do. > >> >> Think if we start from the protocol side we will stay there (nowhere) > >> >> for few more years (although SPDY might be even more then we need). > >> > > >> > > >> > I think what matters is having a working SPDY implementation in > tomcat, > >> > inter-operable > >> > with chrome/mod_spdy/google. If we start with this we'll probably make > >> > more progress than by discussing protocols :-) > >> > >> Yep, I have noted that people are preparing an implementation for httpd > >> so at some point it will just "porting" that code to TC. > >> > >> > > http://code.google.com/p/mod-spdy/ > > > > Costin > > > > > > > >> Cheers > >> > >> Jean-Frederic > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org > >> > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org > >
