https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49095
Konstantin Kolinko <knst.koli...@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #3 from Konstantin Kolinko <knst.koli...@gmail.com> 2010-06-07
01:11:05 EDT ---
Fixed in 6.0 in r952090 and will be in 6.0.27 onwards.
Note, that all the affected lines are guarded by if(deferAccept) clauses.
It is easy to remove that clause and extend this implementation of
unlockAccept() that sends a valid "OPTIONS" request upon other connector
implementations. Is it worth doing?
Regarding the 'BSD filters': apparently the documentation on them is here: [1],
[2]
[1] http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=accept_filter&sektion=9
[2] http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=setsockopt&sektion=2 (see
SO_ACCEPTFILTER)
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
