https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49095
Konstantin Kolinko <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #3 from Konstantin Kolinko <[email protected]> 2010-06-07 01:11:05 EDT --- Fixed in 6.0 in r952090 and will be in 6.0.27 onwards. Note, that all the affected lines are guarded by if(deferAccept) clauses. It is easy to remove that clause and extend this implementation of unlockAccept() that sends a valid "OPTIONS" request upon other connector implementations. Is it worth doing? Regarding the 'BSD filters': apparently the documentation on them is here: [1], [2] [1] http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=accept_filter&sektion=9 [2] http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=setsockopt&sektion=2 (see SO_ACCEPTFILTER) -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
