https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15688
--- Comment #5 from Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> 2011-01-12 04:16:49 EST --- The original issue description requested that Jasper "use full-qualified names instead of imports". The key phrase being "instead of" which is what prompted me to close this as invalid. The spec isn't as explicit as I would like but there are hints (e.g. the method signature in table JSP.9-1) that Tomcat's current implementation is what spec authors were intending. That said, and as you point out, there is no harm in using fully qualified class names. My biggest concern (before I read the spec in more detail) was if the imports were removed and a class name was over-looked that a bug would be introduced. With the imports still in place, that won't be an issue. I'll look at adding the explicit class names to Tomcat 7 later today. I don't intend proposing this for back-port. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
