https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51259

Filip Hanik <fha...@apache.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX

--- Comment #2 from Filip Hanik <fha...@apache.org> 2011-05-24 20:51:08 UTC ---
Hi Philippe, take some time and study the implementation. we don't implement
any java.sql interfaces, there is no need to. we use proxies instead. that way
we don't tie ourselves to an implementation.

the only interface we do implement is the javax.sql.DataSource, but we do it in
such a way that it will compile on all versions.

The patch you proposed is not aligned with the style of jdbc-pool, but with the
style of dbcp. 

we don't wrap layers of java.sql.Connection, we just implement interceptors.

This patch, would break that portion of it. So I'm marking wontfix, so you can
submit a better patch.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Reply via email to