https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51259
Filip Hanik <fha...@apache.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #2 from Filip Hanik <fha...@apache.org> 2011-05-24 20:51:08 UTC --- Hi Philippe, take some time and study the implementation. we don't implement any java.sql interfaces, there is no need to. we use proxies instead. that way we don't tie ourselves to an implementation. the only interface we do implement is the javax.sql.DataSource, but we do it in such a way that it will compile on all versions. The patch you proposed is not aligned with the style of jdbc-pool, but with the style of dbcp. we don't wrap layers of java.sql.Connection, we just implement interceptors. This patch, would break that portion of it. So I'm marking wontfix, so you can submit a better patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org