On 21/06/2011 07:21, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: > 2011/6/21 Rainer Jung <rainer.j...@kippdata.de>: >> On 21.06.2011 00:28, ma...@apache.org wrote: >>> Author: markt >>> Date: Mon Jun 20 22:28:57 2011 >>> New Revision: 1137803 >>> >>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1137803&view=rev >>> Log: >>> Ordering >>> >>> Modified: >>> tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml >> >> I always forget whether there's a standard (I would like to have one): >> >> - Ordering of sections: OK, defined by comment in changelog >> - Ordering inside section: >> - chronological (oldest first or last)? >> - first by add, update, fix (in which order?) >> and then chronological (oldest first or last)? >> >> If the rule is clear, I can add it as another comment into the file. >> >> Who knows the rules? > > Fixes having an issue number are sorted by their number, ascending. > That is the only strict rule. > > There is no ordering by add/update/fix. > > Other fixed issues are added to the end of the list, chronologically. > They eventually become mixed with the numbered issues. (I.e., numbered > issues to not "pop up" wrt. others).
Very succinctly put. That is what I have been doing for Tomcat 7 in a nutshell. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
