On 05/07/2011 22:04, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 05/07/2011 21:38, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 05/07/2011 21:33, ma...@apache.org wrote:
>>> Author: markt
>>> Date: Tue Jul  5 20:33:28 2011
>>> New Revision: 1143197
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1143197&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> Not just this test failing. Need a better solution. Revert r1143126.
>>
>> There is something odd going on with these tests and my Linux test VM.
>> It looks like something is going wrong at the JVM level. An update to
>> 1.6.0_26 seems to have helped but hasn't fully fixed this.
>>
>> The common factor across all of the failures is that they go wrong in
>> o.a.c.tribes.transport.ReceiverBase.bind in the recursive re-try calls
>> (essentially all the retires fail even though there are ports available).
>>
>> I am going to experiment with different re-try approaches, probably
>> introducing a little delay since it looks like a timing issue.
>>
>> I've tried and failed to produce a simple test case that recreates the
>> bind failure.
> 
> OK, with a silly amount of concurrency, I can reproduce this on Windows.
> Next step, getting the test case to use ReceiverBase.

Or maybe not. Looks like I was hitting some sort of limit for open
server sockets. Odd number though - 598. Anyway, I'm experimenting with
some alternative ReceiverBase implementations. I may have something
tomorrow.

Mark



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Reply via email to