2011/9/27 Bill Barker <billbar...@apache.org>:
> To whom it may engage...
>
> This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
> more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
> and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
>
> Project tomcat-trunk-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
> This issue affects 1 projects,
> and has been outstanding for 8 runs.
> The current state of this project is 'Failed', with reason 'Build Failed'.
> For reference only, the following projects are affected by this:
> - tomcat-trunk-test : Tomcat 8.x, a web server implementing Java Servlet
> 3.1,
> ...
>
>
> Full details are available at:
>
> http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/tomcat-trunk/tomcat-trunk-test/index.html
>
[junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 4.298 sec
[junit] Test
org.apache.catalina.tribes.group.TestGroupChannelMemberArrival FAILED
==================
TEST-org.apache.catalina.tribes.group.TestGroupChannelMemberArrival.BIO.txt:
Testcase: testMemberArrival took 4.277 sec
FAILED
Checking member arrival length expected:<9> but was:<19>
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Checking member arrival length
expected:<9> but was:<19>
at
org.apache.catalina.tribes.group.TestGroupChannelMemberArrival.testMemberArrival(TestGroupChannelMemberArrival.java:77)
==================
TEST-org.apache.catalina.tribes.group.TestGroupChannelMemberArrival.NIO.txt
Testcase: testMemberArrival took 4.262 sec
==================
I think it is some timing issue, because NIO test succeeded and IIRC
this test does not depend on connector implementation.
(Still 9 vs 19 sounds like a big difference).
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
