https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
--- Comment #33 from Pid <bugzi...@pidster.com> 2012-02-10 09:45:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #31) > Flexibility more than anything, the developer may require access to the > request > in order to determine / set the initial state of the socket or application. 4.2.1.10 says "Optionally, other header fields, such as those used to send cookies or request authentication to a server." Would just the header map be enough? Given that these are potentially long running requests, keeping the original request object around might not be such a good idea. Would passing in a minimal or partial object copy be better? You wouldn't want to be able to permit a write to the ServletOutputStream for example. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
